Jump to Navigation

Glaxo real estate reassessment may cost school districts millions

Real estate throughout the country doesn't have the value it once did. School districts, dependent on property taxes to fund education, are struggling to hold onto tax monies under old assessment values. In Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, two school districts are in a nail-biting commercial property tax dispute with one large taxpayer - GlaxoSmithKline.

The Upper Merion and Spring-Ford School Districts are worried that the big pharmaceutical company's appeal to have its property-tax burden reduced will cost them millions. A retroactive reassessment from the time the company filed a lawsuit in 2007 could mean that, instead of the company paying real estate taxes, the districts might owe Glaxo a refund.

The districts have already anticipated big income losses for the next school year, when Glaxo's property tax payments are expected to be downsized $2 to $3.5 million along with the company's land assessment. Both districts have made sacrifices, including staff cuts.

To counteract Glaxo's probable settlement, taxes are being raised in the districts next year. Taxes for Spring-Ford will go up more than 3 percent, while Merion School District tax rates will jump more than 9 percent.

The revenue-embattled school districts are trying to come to terms with just how much GlaxoSmithKline may have been overtaxed. The schools say the pharmaceutical firm is owed about $6 million, but Glaxo feels it is due more than $10 million. Should the two sides continue to disagree, the matter will be heard in court this fall.

The Upper Merion and Spring-Ford School Districts are not the only casualties under new, lower tax assessments. Other Philadelphia-area districts are losing tax money. West Chester gave up over $300,000 in revenue when three mall properties were reassessed. Commercial property reassessments in Montgomery County cost North Penn School District $1.4 million.

Source: Philly.com, "Glaxo tax disputes could cost school districts millions," Dan Hardy, 15 June 2011

3 Comments

Is commercial real estate investing a better investment than investing in residential properties? Now, we all know that real estate in general is a great investment vehicle and both residential and commercial properties can be good investments. Either avenue can have a tremendous effect on your net worth, but most people think only of residential property when they think about investing in real estate. While this is certainly the most viable route for most people, commercial property can offer additional benefits the residential model can not offer.

You're going to identify two things about your marketing content. The first is to identify the major problem or pain that your content will help the recipient avoid? The second is to identify the most compelling benefits about your content to the recipient. So, pain avoidance and benefits are your headline's focus. The interesting thing about headlines is that pain avoidance is actually more enticing to people than benefits.

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Subscribe To This Blog's Feed
Contact our firm

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close
Visit Our Real Estate Law Website >>

Office Location

Avallone Law Associates
215 South Broad Street
Fifth Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19107

Local: 215-253-3855
Toll Free: 877-223-0579
Fax: 215-545-3817

Map
Map & Directions
E-mail the firm

Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business.

FindLaw Network